Database Approaches in .NET Core: Code-First vs Database-First Explained for Beginners

Why Most Beginners Get Confused Choosing a Database Approach in .NET Core? 

Beginners often confused - Here are the main reasons why this confusion happens:

 

1. Too Many Options, Not Enough Context

It's common for beginners to feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of data access options in the .NET ecosystem. The key is to understand that these technologies are not competing to solve the same problem. Instead, they operate at different levels of abstraction to address different needs, from raw speed to developer productivity. 

 

2. .NET Learning Curve is Already Steep

ASP.NET Core has a lot: Startup, Middleware, Dependency Injection, Routing, Controllers, Services.

Adding database decisions (e.g., how to scaffold models or handle migrations) is just another layer on top of all that.

 

3. Misleading or Fragmented Tutorials

Some tutorials say “Use EF Core, it's simple!”
Others say “EF is slow, use Dapper!”
Others start from a pre-built DB and say “Use Scaffold-DbContext!”

Without real-world guidance, they follow conflicting advice.

 

4. They Don’t Yet Know the Project Requirements

Most beginners don’t know how the data layer fits into the bigger picture of their app:

Will the DB be built from scratch?
Is there an existing database?
Who maintains the DB: the dev team or a DBA?
Will it be hosted in SQL Server, SQLite, or something else?
how can they decide on Code-First vs Database-First if they don’t know what the project needs?

 

5. Migrations and Scaffolding Feel Like “Magic”

Can feel like “black box” magic. Beginners might not understand:

What’s happening behind the scenes?
Where are the SQL scripts?
What if I mess something up? Fear of breaking things adds confusion and hesitation.


6. EF Core Is Powerful but Opinionated

EF Core encourages a Code-First, C#-centric workflow — but many corporate environments are Database-First, especially where DBAs manage the schema.Beginners often build personal projects one way, then join a job where it’s done totally differently

 

The choice between ADO.NET, Dapper, and EF Core can be viewed as a trade-off between control and convenience.

 

Low abstraction (manual): ADO.NET

The problem it solves: Offers the rawest and fastest way to connect to a database, providing the most granular control over every aspect of the data flow.

Analogy: Driving a manual transmission car. You have full control, but you have to manage everything yourself.

Use cases: High-performance systems where every millisecond counts, or for complex, fine-tuned database operations. It's the building block for other libraries, including Dapper and EF Core.

 

Medium abstraction (hybrid): Dapper

The problem it solves: Eliminates the tedious, repetitive code (boilerplate) of mapping SQL results to C# objects, without sacrificing the performance of raw SQL.

Analogy: Driving a semi-automatic car. The manual gear changes are automated, but you still drive the car.

Use cases: Microservices, web APIs, and other applications where performance is critical, but the high-level features of a full ORM are unnecessary.

High abstraction (automatic): EF Core

The problem it solves: Automates almost all of the data access logic, translating C# code into database commands. It simplifies complex database operations like relationship management and schema changes.

Analogy: Driving an automatic car. It's easy, convenient, and you don't have to worry about the internal mechanics of changing gears.

Use cases: Most standard business applications, especially those that are data-centric and would benefit from rapid development and easier maintenance. 

 

When using Entity Framework Core you have to decide whether to design your database from code or from an existing schema.

 

Code-First approach


Code-First is a development approach in Entity Framework Core where you define your database schema using C# classes, and EF Core generates the database structure (tables, relationships, constraints) for you.

C# Code EF Core SQL Database

 

When to Use Code-First

·       You’re building a new app from scratch

·       Your team controls both application and database

·       You prefer versioning your DB schema via code and migrations

·       You want to use agile or TDD workflows

 

Benefits of Code-First

·       Full control in C#

·       Clean separation of concerns

·       Easy to version and track changes with migrations

·       Easy to test and refactor

 

Possible Challenges

·       Requires understanding of EF Core conventions

·       Might be harder with complex or legacy databases

·       Migration conflicts can happen in teams


How to implement Code-First approach

1. Create .NET core project with .NET core version. 


2. Create folder named "Models" inside project folder


3. Add Category Class and properties for category


4. Add Product Class and properties for the product

5. Add DB Context


6. Add following nugget packages with supported version    

  •     dotnet add package Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer
  •     dotnet add package Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools


7. Add Connection string in appsetting.json file



8. Register EF core in program.cs


9. Build your project and open package manager console


10. Add  dotnet-ef tool if not installed (Optional)

  •     dotnet tool install --global dotnet-ef


11. Run following command 

  •     dotnet ef migrations add initialCreate
  •     dotnet ef database update

    

12. Database is created now you can use your database.


For video tutorial on codefirst approach please check click on link : Video URL



Database-First approach


In the Database-First approach, you start with an existing database (tables, relationships, stored procedures, etc.), and EF Core generates C# entity classes and a DbContext for you.

SQL Database EF Core C# Code

 

When to Use Database-First

·       The database already exists

·       A DBA or another system manages the schema

·       You want to integrate an existing database into a .NET app

·       You don’t want EF Core to modify the database

 

Pros of Database-First

·       Fast way to work with existing databases

·       No need to recreate what already exists

·       Great for legacy or enterprise systems

·       Supports complex schemas, views, stored procedures

 

Cons of Database-First

·       You don’t control the database from code

·       No migrations — changes to DB must be done manually

·       Regenerating scaffolding can overwrite changes (unless you separate logic)

·       Can lead to tightly coupled database logic


      How to implement Database-First Approach

        

    1. Create Project with .net core framework




    2. Create database, tables or use existing tables


    3. Add following nuget packages

    dotnet add package Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer

    dotnet add package Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools

    dotnet add package Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design

 

    4. Open Package Manager Console and run the scaffolding command


    dotnet ef dbcontext scaffold "Server=.;Database=SchoolDB;Trusted_Connection=True;" Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer -o Models -f


    5. This generate DbContext and model in the output directory folder


    6. Now you can implement your code and run the project


       For video tutorial on codefirst approach please check click on link : Video URL

    
Tools & Technologies used:  

- .NET Core (.NET 9)  

- Entity Framework Core  

- SQL Server  

- EF Core CLI 

    - Visual Studio 2026 Insider 

    #dotnet #entityframeworkcore #aspnetcore #csharp #webdevelopment #softwareengineering #efcore #sqlserver #backenddevelopment

💡 Don't forget to like 👍, comment 💬, and subscribe 🔔 for more .NET Core and EF Core tutorials!


    



    







 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Middleware in .NET Core

Dev tunnels